Category: Recent News
THE AUGVAPE/MIKE VAPES INTAKE MTL RTA!
A PBusardo Review – The Augvape/Mike Vapes Intake MTL RTA
In this video we take a look at the Mike’s newest creation, the Intake MTL RTA! We also announce the winner of the last “Not A” Contest.
The Links:
Augvape
Mike’s Website – Hit That Juice
The #1 Best Selling Flavor in the Unsalted Line… The Delicious Watermelon Peach (and the other flavors too) @ Dash Vapes (Canada)
The #1 Best Selling Flavor in the Unsalted Line… The Delicious Watermelon Peach (and the other flavors too) @ Rocky Top Vapor (US)
The Video:
*NOTE: Any use of these videos in part or in their entirety without Phil Busardo’s expressed written consent is strictly prohibited.
The Photos:
Thank you to and please support the Premiere Taste Your Juice Sponsor…
THE KROMA-Z… MTL AND RDL POD MOD VAPING AT IT’S BEST! DID YOU GET YOURS YET?
The Kroma-Z continues to receive positive reviews and high praise from all around the world!
See the Vaping Post Results here or click the image below…
THANK YOU FRANCE! MERCI LA FRANCE!
(English translation: With an xxl 3000 mAh battery life and refillable pods, the Kroma-Z is solid, easy to use and has a very good grip. The Kroma-Z clearly tops our ranking)
(English translation: The new generation-Z)
VAPING NEWS: SAN FRANCISCO [Nanny State Legislation]
“The city of San Francisco is dealing with many pressing problems, such as skyrocketing homelessness, a surge in crime and poverty, a tourism industry in free fall, etc. Yet, amidst all of these troubling issues, the City Board of Supervisors is busy playing nanny state, following suit of California politics. Recently, San Francisco’s City Board of Supervisors voted to advance an invasive piece of legislation that would ban smoking inside private dwellings located in an apartment with three or more units. The bill, filed on November 12, applies to smoking tobacco, vaping, and cannabis products. Not only would this overreaching legislation apply to private dwellings, but it would also include private patios and balconies.”
ARTICLE LINK:
San Francisco: Nanny State Ground Zero
FOR MY FRENCH VISITORS: USA : l’apocalypse post-PMTA a-t-elle eu lieu ? Dimitris Agrafiotis et Gregory Conley répondent
Dimitris Agrafiotis : En fait, rien ne s’est concrètement passé qui aurait un effet immédiat sur les vapoteurs et l’industrie. Beaucoup d’entreprises ont entrepris de déposer des PMTA afin de rester sur le marché un an ou plus, selon la rapidité avec laquelle la FDA les examinera. Et c’est un énorme travail. On assiste quand même à une modification du marketing de la part des entreprises. Celles qui se sont mises dans les clous en soumettant une PMTA en ont fait la promotion, mais cela ne semble pas avoir un impact énorme. La FDA n’a pas vraiment respecté le délai non plus, nous n’avons pas vu d’inspections, ni d’envoi massif de lettres d’avertissement pour les produits non conformes.
Voir l’article entier ici
FROM REGULATOR WATCH – Irreconcilable Conflict | Principle Behind Public Health’s War on Vaping
Here’s the latest from Brent Stafford at Regulator Watch:
Big tobacco is evil. This “truth” serves as the foundation for tobacco control policymaking across most of the world.
Public health bureaucrats, politicians and non-profit health advocacy groups believe so strongly in the evil of big tobacco that they ostracize any person or group they deem to be advancing the interests of the tobacco industry.Perhaps big tobacco is evil. Combustible tobacco products are deadly and for decades the industry lied to the public, marketed to children and spent untold millions influencing public policy. Yet, by branding big tobacco as evil, public health organizations like the WHO have egregiously marked vastly less harmful alternatives to smoking, such as vaping and snus as complicit.
Joining us today on RegWatch is Clive Bates, tobacco control policy expert and former Director of Action on Smoking and Health (UK). Bates believes tobacco control crusaders have baked into policy a principle of “irreconcilable conflict” between the interests of the tobacco industry and public health. Bates says the principle is both permanent and inescapable.
What does this mean for vaping?
Find out, only on RegWatch by RegulatorWatch.com.
Released: November 21, 2020
Produced by Brent Stafford
Make RegWatch happen, go to: support.regulatorwatch.com
THE FAMOVAPE MAGMA AIO!
A PBusardo Review – The Famovape Magma AIO
In this video we take a look at the Famovape Magma AIO and add it to the currently running contest!
The Links:
Famovape
Elego Mall
The #1 Best Selling Flavor in the Unsalted Line… The Delicious Watermelon Peach (and the other flavors too) @ Dash Vapes (Canada)
The #1 Best Selling Flavor in the Unsalted Line… The Delicious Watermelon Peach (and the other flavors too) @ Rocky Top Vapor (US)
The Video:
*NOTE: Any use of these videos in part or in their entirety without Phil Busardo’s expressed written consent is strictly prohibited.
The Photos:
Thank you to and please support the Premiere Taste Your Juice Sponsor…
VAPING NEWS: MISSOULA, MONTANA [Flavors Banned]
“Missoula has become Montana’s first city to pass an ordinance prohibiting the sale of flavored e-cigarette and vape products. On a vote of 8 to 4 the Missoula City Council Monday night passed the ordinance banning the sale of all flavored vaping products within city limits, extending five miles out into the county. It also requires retailers to keep all tobacco products behind the counter and away from underage minors. The move comes three months after the state health department, facing pushback from legislators, withdrew a proposal to enact a permanent statewide ban on the sale and marketing of flavored e-cigarettes. Missoula’s ban on flavored vape products takes effect on January 25th. Both supporters and critics of the ordinance expect a legal challenge to the rule.”
ARTICLE LINK:
Missoula Bans Sale of Flavored Vape Products; Lawsuit Threatened
VAPING NEWS: RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL [Benefits Vaping Nicotine]
“A Randomized Clinical Trial from researchers at California State University, University of Kansas, Brown University, and (amazingly) the University of California San Francisco has shown that vaping “did not increase nicotine exposure and led to short-term reduction in the major pulmonary carcinogen, NNAL, compared with continued smoking.””
BILL TARLING — NOTE: JAMA is a Pay-To-Publish service, and not an actual Scientifically Peer Reviewed publication — so, as with all the anti-vaping reports that get quickly published on that service without scientific verification, we must take into account these Clinical Trial findings are also published on the JAMA Pay-To-Publish service rather than a professional Scientific Publication
ARTICLE LINK:
VAPING NEWS: NO SIGNIFICANT ADDITIONAL RISK FROM 2ND HAND VAPOR
“Researchers in Mexico, New Zealand and Italy have conducted a modeling study suggesting that the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) being transmitted via indoor vaping is not significantly higher than the risk associated with other types of expiration. Compared with exposure to regular breathing (without vaping) within the indoor environment, exposure to low-intensity expirations from an infectious vaper only increased the risk of transmission by an additional 1%. This risk must be kept in perspective with respect to the risk posed by other expiratory activities. The evolution of bioaerosols transmitting disease via respiratory droplets has already been widely studied.”
ARTICLE LINK:
Vaping does not appear to pose any significant additional risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission
VAPING NEWS: CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL [Flavor Ban]
“Soon after California passed the flavor ban legislation, on October 9, 2020, a group of tobacco manufacturers and retailers (Plaintiffs) sued the State in federal court seeking to invalidate the law. They will be irreparably harmed because the California law is unconstitutional and will cause them substantial financial losses. On November 12, 2020, the California Attorney General (AG) responded with a brief in opposition to Plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary injunction. The AG argued, in part, that: The balance of equities does not support the extraordinary remedy of issuing a preliminary injunction because, in part, nothing in the new California law prevents Plaintiffs from making or marketing their products in other jurisdictions or from selling non-flavored products. Given that we have seen permanent, state level flavor bans or restrictions in only five states, early litigation in states like California could provide a roadmap for Attorneys General in states that may take similar action in the future.”
ARTICLE LINK:
California Attorney General Continues Fight to Ban Flavored Tobacco Products
“A coalition representing the tobacco industry said Tuesday it has turned in more than 1 million signatures as it seeks to qualify a referendum for the November 2022 ballot aimed at overturning a law banning the retail sale of flavored tobacco products in California. If the Secretary of State’s office determines there is a sufficient number of signatures to qualify the referendum, the new law, which was scheduled to take effect Jan. 1, would be suspended until the voters act on the ballot measure in November 2022.”
ARTICLE LINK:
Tobacco industry submits signatures on California referendum to block ban on flavored products sales
Store
