Posted in Is It Safe Recent News

Vape Shop Air Sampling by California State Health Department Suggests that Secondhand Vape Exposure is Minimal

As part of its investigation into the potential health effects of electronic cigarettes, the California Department of Public Health has been conducting air sampling and personal exposure monitoring in vape shops throughout the state. The results of sampling in one of these vape shops, obtained by The Rest of the Story, reveal that “secondhand vaping” appears to result in minimal exposure of bystanders to hazardous chemicals.

This study, although conducted under very high exposure conditions in a small, non-ventilated vape shop with many employees and customers vaping and clouds of vapor visible, did not document any dangerous levels of exposure to any hazardous chemical. Nicotine exposure was essentially non-existent. Formaldehyde exposure was no different than in many indoor and outdoor environments at baseline. Acetone, acetoin, other aldehydes, toluene, benzene, and xylene were not detected. Chemicals that have been associated with “popcorn lung” were also not detected by the standard method.

Read more HERE.

Share Button
Posted in Is It Safe Recent News

E-cigarettes do not promote cancer growth in lab tests

A new study found no evidence that a commercially available e-cigarette vapor promotes the development of cancer in laboratory cells. In contrast, smoke from a reference cigarette was positive for cancer-promoting activity at very low concentrations.

Read more HERE.

Share Button
Posted in Recent News

FROM THE TONY ABBOUD/VTA – FDA TO ISSUE GUIDANCE DEFERRING DEADLINES BY THREE MORE MONTHS.

BREAKING (GOOD) NEWS: FDA TO ISSUE GUIDANCE DEFERRING DEADLINES BY THREE MORE MONTHS.

VTA has been working closely with Breathe Easier Alliance of Alabama (BEAA) on an administration strategy for the past couple months. Last week, we met with senior leadership at HHS emphasizing the need to re-evaluate the deeming regulation. Earlier today, Stacey Hamilton, President of BEAA and VTA Board Member, informed us that FDA sought an extension of its briefing schedule in Cyclops Vapor v. FDA so that the FDA could re-evaluate the deeming.

Sure enough, this afternoon FDA announced that it is doing so in all cases and that it is going to issue guidance to defer enforcement of all future compliance deadlines for all newly deemed products by an additional 3 months so that new leadership at the FDA and the Department of Health and Human Services can have additional time to more fully consider issues raised by the final rule that are now the subject of multiple lawsuits.

This is an important step forward in our D.C. efforts. Stay tuned for more to come.

Share Button
Posted in Recent News

THIS JUST IN FROM THE FDA – 3 MONTH EXTENSION GRANTED

Good evening,

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is announcing information about the outstanding compliance deadlines related to the May 2016 final rule that extended the agency’s authority to additional tobacco products, including e-cigarettes, cigars, hookah tobacco and pipe tobacco, among others.

In lawsuits regarding the final rule, the FDA has stated that it will defer enforcement of all future compliance deadlines under the rule for electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) such as e-cigarettes, cigars, and pipe tobacco for three months. In light of this, the FDA also intends to defer enforcement of all future compliance deadlines for all categories of newly regulated products for three months and plans to issue guidance describing its position in the near future.

This concerns deadlines set for May 10, 2017, or later, including those for manufacturer submission of cigar warning label plans, registration and listing, ingredient listing, health documents, substantial equivalence exemption requests, substantial equivalence applications, premarket tobacco product applications (PMTAs), and harmful and potentially harmful constituent (HPHC) reports.

This does not apply to provisions of the final rule where compliance deadlines already have passed, such as mandatory age and photo-ID checks to prevent illegal sales to minors.

This extension will allow new leadership at the FDA and the Department of Health and Human Services additional time to more fully consider issues raised by the final rule that are now the subject of multiple lawsuits in federal court.

Please contact me with any questions.

Lindsay R. Tobias
Policy Analyst, Stakeholder Relations Office

Center for Tobacco Products
Office of the Center Director
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
301-796-6743 (o)
240-507-8453 (m)
Lindsay.Tobias@fda.hhs.gov

Share Button
Posted in Recent News

FROM CASAA – Out of the budget but, still in the fight!

Out of the budget but, still in the fight!

Our fight does not end here!

The effort behind the Cole-Bishop amendment has made significant inroads with Congress, and members are gaining a better understanding of the importance of this issue. In fact, throughout this process of building support, several members of Congress have shared that staff, friends, and family members have experienced success by switching to vapor products. For them, like us, this issue is personal, and our relationships with all of these people will be vital on the road ahead.

There’s another budget in five months (September). In the interim, gathering support for HR 1136 remains a high priority. While the larger effort to establish a separate regulatory regime for low-risk tobacco and nicotine products is certainly important, the immediate need remains buying more time for the vapor industry. Although having the Cole-Bishop amendment stripped from the budget may feel like defeat, it is another opportunity to continue building momentum and win more support in the fall. We have not lost ground, and, in fact, we’ve moved the ball forward by increasing visibility of our issue and identifying new allies.

We are appealing to the administration for relief as well. HHS Secretary Tom Price is in a position to delay full implementation of the FDA regulations, and CASAA is encouraging our members to reach out to him. Whether you are a vapor business or consumer, you have an important role to play in this particular effort, and we will provide more details about contacting the Secretary Price soon. If you haven’t already, please see our post about this engagement to get started.

We need to be clear about other irons in the fire. “The Cigarette Smoking Reduction and Electronic Vapor Alternatives Act of 2017” (HR 2194) was introduced by Representative Duncan Hunter (R-CA-50) last week. CASAA has contributed to HR 2194, and we look forward to continuing the dialogue about this effort. However, our support comes with the understanding that there are still issues that need to be addressed in the legislation. CASAA’s ultimate goal has always been for Congress to establish a more rational regulatory system for low-risk nicotine-containing products, and while this is likely to be a lengthy process, we’re excited that the conversation has begun.

CASAA and others are focused on the immediate need of protecting access to vapor products through 2018. Without modernizing the predicate date and/or seeing some sort of administrative relief, there will be little infrastructure left of the vapor industry to move a bill like HR 2194 after 2018. Now, more than ever is the time to make our voices heard!

Share Button
Posted in Recent News

FROM GREG CONLEY – Democrat Leaders Celebrate as Industry-Saving Cole-Bishop Amendment Is Killed in Budget Deal

Contact: Gregory Conley
Tel: 609-947-8059
Email: gconley@vaping.org
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

May 1, 2017 at 2:00 pm EST

Democrat Leaders Celebrate as Industry-Saving Cole-Bishop Amendment Is Killed in Budget Deal

House and Senate Democrats boast about keeping vapor industry on path to prohibition

 

WASHINGTON, DC — Yesterday, leadership in the U.S. House and Senate struck a deal on an omnibus government funding bill to keep the government operating through October.  Much to the disappointment of millions of vapers and 10,000-plus small business owners, the Cole-Bishop Amendment — a critical bipartisan policy provision to save the vapor industry from prohibition by the FDA — was not included in the final bill.

Democrat leaders, who hold a great deal of power in budget negotiations due to the 60-vote threshold in the Senate and the unwillingness of some House Republicans to vote for spending bills, immediately celebrated their ‘victory’ over small businesses and ex-smokers.

“We have eliminated more than 160 Republican poison pill riders,” boasted House Minority Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA). Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the senior Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee, similarly celebrated the deal.  Rep. Nita Lowey (D-NY), the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, included Cole-Bishop among the list of riders that Democrats were proud to have removed from the final bill.

“It is absolutely shameful that Democrat leaders stood in the way of this job-protecting amendment from becoming law,” said Gregory Conley, President of the American Vaping Association, a nonprofit that advocates for the continued availability of vapor products.

“Democrats are setting themselves up to experience a reality check on vaping in the November 2018 mid-term elections,” said Conley. “The FDA’s deeming ban is set to take effect less than three months before Senate Democrats have some of their toughest election fights in years. Just as vapers helped re-elect Senator Ron Johnson, vapers will vote out Senators who stand by idly as harm reduction products are yanked from shelves.”

Conley cautioned that while Democrat leaders ultimately sunk the Cole-Bishop Amendment, it would be a mistake for vapers to blame the entire party. As of today, six House Democrats have sponsored a standalone version of the Cole-Bishop bill.

Despite the disappointment, Conley has an important message for vapers and harm reduction advocates — the fight is far from over.

“We must redouble our efforts, focusing on not only Congress, but also the executive branch,” said Conley. “If Congress refuses to act, President Trump and Health & Human Services Secretary Tom Price must act to avert this oncoming disaster for public health and small businesses.”

Last week, a letter signed by over 2,000 business owners was sent to Secretary Price requesting that he take immediate action to repeal, halt, or dramatically delay the FDA’s push for vapor prohibition. Additionally, in-store campaigns in vapor retail stores have led to thousands of individual consumer letters being sent to Secretary Price.

If enacted, the Cole-Bishop Amendment would have modernized the predicate date for newly-regulated ‘tobacco’ products under the Family Smoking Prevention & Tobacco Control Act.  The failure to pass this measure means that all vapor products that have come to market since February 15, 2007 — every single vapor product being sold today — will have to retroactively undergo a potentially multi-million dollar approval process to remain on the market.

Last year, the Royal College of Physicians released a landmark study estimating vaping to be at least 95% less harmful than smoking.  Additionally, earlier this year, the University of Victoria’s Center for Addictions Research of BC published a report strongly disputing the idea that vaping is acting as a gateway to smoking for adolescents.

# # #

 

About the American Vaping Association

The American Vaping Association is a nonprofit organization that advocates for policies that encourage the growth and sustainability of small- and medium-sized businesses in the rapidly growing vaping and electronic cigarette industry. The AVA was founded by Gregory Conley, a consumer and industry advocate with a long track record of advocating for vapor products dating back to 2010.

We are dedicated to educating the public and government officials about public health benefits offered by vapor products, which are battery-powered devices that heat a liquid nicotine or nicotine-free solution and create an inhalable vapor.  The AVA is not a trade group and does not speak for any particular business, including our industry sponsors.

You can learn more about AVA and vaping by visiting the AVA website. You can also find us on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.

Share Button
Posted in Battery Mooch Recent News

A BATTERY MOOCH POST: Cylaid 10A 3500mAh 18650 Bench Test Results…a rewrapped 8A battery

This Cylaid is a slightly overrated cell with a useless pulse rating. It matches the Samsung 35E in both appearance and in performance.

While this cell has the claimed 10A rating in fine print on the wrap it has a useless 20A “max pulse discharge” rating on the wrap too. It also features “20A” in a larger font which many people will use as the cell’s rating when shopping or when a vendor displays it on their web site. For these reasons I feel the large “20A” rating, or any “pulse” or “max” rating, is misleading and shouldn’t be used.

I am rating this Cylaid at 8A and 3500mAh.

My thanks to Cylaid for donating the two cells for testing! (https://cylaid18650.en.alibaba.com)

Test results, discharge graph, photos: https://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/threads/cylaid-10a-3500mah-18650-bench-test-results-a-rewrapped-8a-battery.801091/

All my test results to date: https://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/blog-entry/list-of-battery-tests.7436/

Share Button
Posted in Battery Mooch Recent News

A BATTERY MOOCH POST: Cylaid 25A 3000mA Bench Test Results…just an overrated 15A battery

This Cylaid is an overrated cell with a useless pulse rating. It matches the Sony VTC6 in both appearance and in performance.

While this cell has the claimed 25A rating in fine print on the wrap it has an even more useless 40A “max pulse discharge” rating on the wrap too. It also features “40A” in a larger font which many people will use as the cell’s rating when shopping or when a vendor displays it on their web site. For these reasons I feel the large “40A” rating, or any “pulse” rating, is misleading and shouldn’t be used.

I am rating this Cylaid at 15A and 3000mAh.

My thanks to Cylaid for donating the two cells for testing! (https://cylaid18650.en.alibaba.com)

Test results, discharge graph, photos: https://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/threads/cylaid-25a-3000mah-18650-bench-test-results-just-an-overrated-20a-battery.800861/

All my test results to date: https://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/blog-entry/list-of-battery-tests.7436/

Share Button
Posted in Battery Mooch Recent News

A BATTERY MOOCH POST: Cylaid 35A 2600mAh 18650 Bench Test Results…just a very overrated 25A battery

This Cylaid is an overrated cell with a useless pulse rating. At its claimed 35A continuous rating its temperature rose above the boiling point of water, reaching the dangerously high level of 111°C. This clearly shows the claimed 35A continuous current rating is ridiculous.

While this cell has the claimed 35A rating in fine print on the wrap it has an even more useless 50A “max pulse discharge” rating on the wrap too. It also features “50A” in a larger font which many people will use as the cell’s rating when shopping or when a vendor displays it on their web site. For these reasons I feel the large “50A” rating, or any “pulse” rating, is misleading and shouldn’t be used.

This Cylaid matches the Sony VTC5A in appearance and in performance.

I am rating this Cylaid at 25A and 2600mAh.

My thanks to Cylaid for donating the two cells for testing! (https://cylaid18650.en.alibaba.com)

Test results, discharge graph, photos: https://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/threads/cylaid-35a-2600mah-18650-bench-test-results-just-a-very-overrated-25a-battery.800717/

All my test results to date: https://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/blog-entry/list-of-battery-tests.7436/

Share Button
Posted in Battery Mooch Recent News

A BATTERY MOOCH POST: Cylaid 25A 2200mAh 18650 Bench Test Results…an accurately rated 25A battery

Bottom Line: This Cylaid is a true 25A cell that performs well and appears to be a Sony VTC rewrap.

While this cell has the 25A continuous current rating in small print on the wrap it has a useless 40A “max pulse discharge” rating on the wrap too. It also features “40A” in a larger font which many people will use as the cell’s rating when shopping or when a vendor displays it on their web site. For these reasons I feel the large “40A” rating, or any “pulse” rating, is misleading and shouldn’t be used.

It has the distinct Sony VTC top contact structure but uses a venting disk that doesn’t match any VTC venting disk I’ve seen before. This Cylaid cell doesn’t match the performance of any VTC cell I’ve tested before either.It tests out better than the VTC4 but worse than the VTC5A. I don’t know which cell they might be rewrapping.

I am rating this Cylaid at 25A and 2200mAh.

My thanks to Cylaid for donating the two cells for testing! (https://cylaid18650.en.alibaba.com)

Test results, discharge graph, photos: https://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/threads/cylaid-25a-2200mah-18650-bench-test-results-an-accurately-rated-25a-battery.800589/

All my test results to date: https://www.e-cigarette-forum.com/forum/blog-entry/list-of-battery-tests.7436/

Share Button